Footnotes
...INSPECT
Thanks to Gary Edwards for suggesting this name.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...available,
This availability is one the problems checked by INSPECT.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...plan:
In the descriptions of the problems, the term objective means any objective in the air campaign plan.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...artificial.
This problem occurs in practice when ACPT users add parents to an objective to force the tool to give it high priority (a somewhat idiosyncratic problem in the way ACPT prioritizes objectives).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...objectives.
Specificity is basically verified by the type of objects the objective refers to. For example, and objective that deals with ``Petroleum distribution'' is more specific than an objective that refers to ``Petroleum capability''.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Andre Valente
Fri Sep 13 19:10:15 PDT 1996