Re: set_object_with_name???

Pedro Szekely ([email protected])
Thu, 08 Jun 1995 09:31:13 PDT

Kurt,

You are right, if the object to be instantiated needs more slots, then things
are more complicated.

Let me ask the following questions:

- For the examples we have now, is it the case that you need an object of a
subclass?

- If you do, would it be too painful to include at least the class definition
in the place where it is first introduced?

I am against adding more features to the object system at this point unless
there is no reasonable workaround with the current functionality. We have so
many other things to do.

Pedro Szekely
USC/ISI, 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Phone: 310/822-1511, Fax: 310/823-6714
URL: http://www.isi.edu/isd/szekely.html