[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ns] Re: Some doubts in TCP throughput
Hi,
Thanks for your email. I was actually referring to
GEO RTT delay + some delay in equipments.
But, for this question sake, let me keep it at 500ms
RTT. Can you please help me with the throughput
calculation.
128*8 /.5 = 2.048Mbps.
Can you please let me know whether there this is the
theoritical best throughput achievable without
increasing window size?
Thank you
Srihari Raghavan
--- Lloyd Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Srihari Raghavan wrote:
>
> > Let's say that there is a link with a delay of
> 700ms
> > (satellite)
>
> 700ms?
>
> You're hard-pressed to take more than a quarter of
> second to get to
> geostationary orbit and back. What satellite and
> link delay are you
> thinking of?
>
> J. Postel, "Satellite considerations", Internet RFC
> 346, May 1972.
> http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc346.txt
>
> M. Allman, S. Dawkins, D. Glover, J. Griner, D.
> Tran, T.Henderson,
> J. Heidemann, J. Touch, H. Kruse, S. Ostermann, K.
> Scott, and
> J. Semke, "Ongoing TCP Research Related to
> Satellites," Internet RFC
> 2760 (Informational), February 2000.
> http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc2760.txt
>
> M. Allman, D. Glover, L. Sanchez, "Enhancing TCP
> Over Satellite
> Channels using Standard Mechanisms", Internet RFC
> 2488 (BCP 28),
> January 1999.
> http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc2488.txt
>
> L.
>
>
<[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com