Re: PILC: prioritization

From: Mikael Degermark (micke@cdt.luth.se)
Date: Fri Jan 22 1999 - 02:27:23 EST


At 16:01 1999-01-21 -0800, Phil Karn wrote:

>This is an interesting topic for this group. The usual instinct is to
>minimize headers when operating on a slow (e.g., wireless) channel,
>but sometimes a little extra overhead might actually improve
>performance. You don't have to avoid very many TCP data packet
>retransmissions to repay the cost of the TCP header timestamps.

The IP header compression scheme can compress TCP headers that contain
the Timestamp Option.

Cheers,

Micke



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 09:12:19 EST