On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 02:21:04PM +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Dan Grossman wrote:
>
> > At risk of repeating myself...
> > What about Section 3?
> > Dan
>
> We are now in option (6) of the options you laid out - revisit during
> last call. Not an unthinkable option.
>
I would like to remind everyone that last call is scheduled to end
this Friday. I'd like to see some more discussion of this topic before
Friday to determine if this issue merits either an extension of last
call or time on the PILC agenda in SLC.
I think the question Dan has raised is "is Section 3 overly
'muddled'"? I.e., should it be revised before submission to the IESG?
--aaron
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 09:12:28 EST