Andrei--
This is a very nice submission and adds some much needed context to
the 2.5g3g draft. I have a couple of comments which are inline.
--aaron
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:05:02AM +0200, Gurtov Andrei wrote:
>
> The main incentive for transition from 2G to 2.5G to 3G is the increased
> data rates for the users.
2G networks have not been defined. Aside: it's important to remember
that the audience here is not just the designers of these networks but
also the IESG and IETF community who may not be familliar with the
terminology.
>
> 2.6 Intersystem handovers
>
...
> Additional problems include context transfer, which is out of scope
> of this document but is addressed by the Seamoby WG [n3].
RFCs live forever but working groups disappear. It is better to refer
to the relevant working group topic than to it by name. E.g., at the
time of this writing there is standardization work on seamless
mobility and micromobility within the IETF.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 09:12:29 EST