Re: [pilc] RE: AD request / L2 Triggers Chapter Statement

From: James Carlson (james.d.carlson@east.sun.com)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 08:11:54 EDT

  • Next message: Lloyd Wood: "Re: [pilc] RE: AD request / L2 Triggers Chapter Statement"

    Lloyd Wood writes:
    > > A link on a host going down isn't enough; the host might be multihomed,
    >
    > The host should know whether it's multihomed or not; it should know
    > what it's immediately connected to. If it's not multihomed and e.g.
    > the AAA server at the other end of the PPPoE line goes down and takes
    > your phoneline's TCP dialtone with it - the immediate link is down and
    > your stack is offline. You can inform the apps.

    How does the stack determine that the link is down because, for
    instance, the peer router is rebooting, and that it will be back in a
    few seconds? Should my ssh session and all of my redirected X11
    windows be blown out of existence because the router at the other end
    of that DSL link bounces?

    I still don't see how link unavailablity is *reasonably* translated
    into TCP connection sniping -- particularly as a default policy.

    -- 
    James Carlson, Solaris Networking         <james.d.carlson@east.sun.com>
    SUN Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.234W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
    MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.497N   Fax +1 781 442 1677
    

    _______________________________________________ pilc mailing list pilc@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 09 2002 - 08:03:03 EDT