Joe Ishac did some work related to generic PEPs and TCP. I'm sure there
are others.
http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~jishac/papers/
Remember, buyer-beware. PEPs are nice, but have limitations - particularly
if encryption is done at the network layer prior to the PEP. That is why
so many are still researching better transport mechanisms - TCP Westwood,
TCP swift-start, etc...
Will
At 03:55 PM 10/8/02 +0200, you wrote:
>This was exactly what I meant SACK, Large windows etc.) do you know of any
>comparison?
>
>
>What do you mean by "extended" TCP. Do you mean TCP with large windows,
>time stamp options, SACK, protect against wrap around. Or is "extended"
>TCP someone's proprietary implementation of TCP.
>
>Will
>
>
> PM 10/7/02 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hello all
> >Does any of you knows whether there ever been a research to compare TCP
> >(extended for satellite comm.)with spoofing mechanisms such as Flash
> >Networks Nettgain and why does this extended TCP was never actually
> >deployed?
> >Thanks
> >Dor
> >_______________________________________________
> >pilc mailing list
> >pilc@ietf.org
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc
> >http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html
> >http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/
>
>
>
>=======================================
>Will Ivancic
>NASA Glenn Research Center
>21000 Brookpark Road MS 54-5
>Cleveland, Ohio 44135
>Phone +1 (216)433-3494
>Fax +1 (216) 433-8705
>Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: ivancic
>http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~ivancic
_______________________________________________
pilc mailing list
pilc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html
http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 08 2002 - 10:23:09 EDT