[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
To who's interested in running ns on win32 [Was: Re: Validation onwin95]
(1) On validation:
I'm sorry, Christian, and thanks a lot for pointing this out. I did get
your validation results on Feburary and later. I looked through those
results again and they showed that the following tests failed:
./test-all-simple ./test-all-tcp ./test-all-red ./test-all-sack
./test-all-schedule ./test-all-red-v1 ./test-all-sack-v1 ./test-all-v1
./test-all-vegas-v1 ./test-all-ecn ./test-all-manual-routing
./test-all-intserv ./test-all-webcache ./test-all-srm
Doing a diff on them reveals that the differences were all due to the
rounding of the last digits of the floating points. Since trace.cc in ns
has been modified to provide its own rounding routine since then, I'll
redo a validate later to check again.
(2) On general installation instructions of ns-2:
Thanks to Matthew Marchant <[email protected]>, who provided a
win32 (95/98/nt) installation tutorial. It's available at
http://mash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns/ns-win32-build.html. Thanks, Matthew!
- Haobo
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, [iso-8859-1] Christian J�nsson wrote:
> Eh, I've done that sometime now and sent you the results a couple of times (with comments too)...
>
> /ChJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Haobo Yu <[email protected]>
> To: Matthew Marchant <[email protected]>
> Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 10:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Validation on win95
>
>
> > > If so what version of cygwin are you using?
> >
> > BTW, I was using the newest one, 20.1beta. Notice that not all validation
> > passes. I checked some of them and they were due to floating point
> > precision problems. But I didn't have time to check all of them. We'd
> > greatly appreciate it if somebody would volunteer to do that.
> >
> > - Haobo
> >
> >
>
>