[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Addressing scheme changed after ns-2.1b5a?
Does this mean we can now have more than 128 nodes in the network now? We
can have up to 2^31 nodes if we are using flat addressing?
Thanks,
Huiwen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nader Salehi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 3:32 PM
> To: Li, Huiwen [SC1:106:EXCH]
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: Addressing scheme changed after ns-2.1b5a?
>
>
> Yes they are correct. In the new addressing scheme, we had to disable
> shifting and masking for the flat addressing that's why shift is 0 and
> mask is 0x7fffffff. Not the most elegant solution, but we have to
> live with it since we need the shift and mask variables for
> hierarchical addressing.
>
> Nader
>
>
> >>> "Huiwen" == Huiwen Li <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Huiwen> Hi, all, I was using ns-2.1b5a before October, now I am using
> Huiwen> the daily snapshot. When I dump the classifier, it gives me
> Huiwen> shift=0, mask=2147483647. I have heard that addressing scheme
> Huiwen> has been changed after ns-2.1b5. I am wondering what this
> Huiwen> change is and where we could find out this change? Is this
> Huiwen> shift and mask value correct?
>
> Huiwen> I appreciate your help.
>
> Huiwen> Huiwen
>
>