[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: NS-2.1b6, Nam-1.0a8 and ns-allinone-2.1b6 were released]

To: Martin Koyabe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NS-2.1b6, Nam-1.0a8 and ns-allinone-2.1b6 were released]
From: Lloyd Wood <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:26:38 +0000 (GMT)
cc: [email protected], ns-users mailing list <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Organization: speaking for none
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Martin Koyabe wrote:

> Nader,
> 
> Remember to up date the 'ns-users Jan'2000 archives' page as well
> 
> http://www-mash.cs.berkeley.edu/dist/archive/ns-users/0001
> 
> Last update 14 Jan 2000 !!

Well, half the messages for December 1999 are not visible from its
index (different hypermail versions generated the index and the email
pages - bad idea) and the rest of the archive is lossy, as I pointed
out in a previous mail to the list - that I can't point you at because
archival hasn't reached it yet.

L.

wonders if hypermail could be running on a cron job.

<[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

References:
- Re: [Fwd: NS-2.1b6, Nam-1.0a8 and ns-allinone-2.1b6 were released]
  - From: Martin Koyabe <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: NS-2.1b6, Nam-1.0a8 and ns-allinone-2.1b6 were released]
Next by Date: Hierarchical adressing
Prev by thread: Re: [Fwd: NS-2.1b6, Nam-1.0a8 and ns-allinone-2.1b6 were released]
Next by thread: negative time in trace file
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread