Re: Quick Q on '$ns at....'

[Haobo Yu <haoboy@isi.edu>]

In this case it does. But as long as they can be differentiated by time,
the order does not matter. 

IMHO, I think the following should be avoided as much as possible; at
least I would certainly be confused when I read it again two months later.

- Haobo

On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Lloyd Wood wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Haobo Yu wrote:
> 
> > The order does not matter.
> 
> What, not even when you're scheduling events at the same point in time
> and not using the list scheduler?
> 
> $ns at 1.0 "$ftp1 start"
> $ns at 1.0 "$ftp2 start"
> 
> vs
> 
> $ns at 1.0 "$ftp2 start"
> $ns at 1.0 "$ftp1 start"
> 
> L.
> 
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Mark Butler wrote:
> > 
> > > Does it matter what order you put the '$ns at ...' commands in.
> > > 
> > > i.e. is
> > > 
> > > $ns at 1.0 "$cbr0 start"
> > > $ns at 2.0 "$cbr0 stop"
> > > 
> > > the same as
> > > 
> > > $ns at 2.0 "$cbr0 stop"
> > > $ns at 1.0 "$cbr0 start"
> 
> <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
> 
>