Re: wnd_init_option_ (again)

[Jun Ke <juk302@mail.usask.ca>]

Hi Lloyd:

Thank you for your fast reply.  The under line I wrote was a typo.  I
really sorry about that.  I attached my original code with this email.
If I move the "trace-all" command in front of the "create_topology",
there is no error.  But If I execute the "trace-all" after
"create_topology",  "Wrong number of wnd_init_option_" occur.  And also
if I change the Agent/TCP/Vegas to Agent/TCP/Reno, it runs fine.  If the
number Agent/TCP/Agent is less than 20, it is also OK.  I really don't
know why "trace-all" has something to do with Agent/TCP/Vegas.  Seems to
me, it is a bug.  I am using ns2.1b6 now.

Thank you for your time.



Lloyd Wood wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jun Ke wrote:
>
> > I found my previous question had something to do with "trace_all"
> > method.  If I ran "trace_all" after "create_topology", there was no
> > error message, however, I could not get any trace information.
>
> That's because the trace-all method in ns is spelt with a minus sign,
> not an underline.
>
> L.
>
> <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

--
Jun Ke
juk302@cs.usask.ca
Dept. of Computer Science
University of Saskatchewan

vegas.tcl