[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Simutation results
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Paul Traina wrote:
> Your simulator may prove far more useful if you add RSVP support, since that
> is in much greater deployment than CR-LDP, despite the CR-LDP hype.
There's already an RSVP implementation for ns. Why reinvent the wheel?
http://titan.cs.uni-bonn.de/%7Egreis/rsvpns/index.html
L.
ccing to ns-users.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woojik Chun [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 3:53 AM
> To: Daniela Cunha
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: Simutation results
>
> Hi, I am a professor at computer eng. dept. of Chungnam National
> Univ in
> KOREA.
> I and my ph.D. student, Gaeil Ahn, are working on an MPLS simulator.
> Our simulator is based on NS developed in U. Berkery.
> First, we define MPLSnode by modifying node of NS
> and add LDP and CR-LDP functionality.
>
> Our NS has capabilities as follows:
> 1. MPLS Packet switching
> - label swapping operation
> - TTL decrement
> - penultimate hop popping
> 2. LDP
> - handling LDP messages(Request, Mapping, Withdraw, Release,
> and
>
> Notification)
> 3. CR-LDP
> - handling CR-LDP messages (Request and Mapping)
> 4. Label Distribution
> - LSP Trigger
> support control-driven and data-driven trigger.
> - Label Allocation and Distribution
> support only downstream-on-demand scheme in control-driven
> trigger.
> support all of both upstream and downstream-on-demand
> scheme in
>
> data driven trigger.
> - Label Distribution Control
> support only independent mode in control-driven trigger.
> support all of both independent and ordered mode in
> data-driven
>
> trigger.
> - Label Retention
> support only conservative mode.
> - ER-LSP based on CR-LDP
> established based on the path information pre-difineded by
> user.
> - Flow Aggregation
> aggregate fine flows into a coarse flow
>
> Currently our simulator has been applied to several examples.
> Those results will be presented in some conference.
> Now we are finalizing our work, documentation, optimization and so
> on.
> We will anounce our tool in public very soon.
>
> If you want to use our tool before anouncement,
> please let us know what type of simulation you need.
> Then, We will check if our tool can be applied to your work.
> (Since there is no user manual or documentation, you may not use our
> tool by yourself)
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > Has anybody done any MPLS simulation??
> > I need some simulation results related to MPLS.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Daniela
>
>
>
<[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>