[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!

To: John Heidemann <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!
From: Lloyd Wood <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:26:12 +0000 (GMT)
cc: Frank Chu <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Organization: speaking for none
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, John Heidemann wrote:

> In general, we archive all versions of our stuff (except when lost),
> but we don't archive other people's stuff.

Even when the other people's stuff morphs into your stuff?
The your/other people's then becomes a bit tenuous, and providing a
complete history of your stuff (as in this case with otcl) seems a
reasonable thing to do.

L.

<[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

Follow-Ups:
- archiving old versions (was: Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!)
  - From: John Heidemann <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!
  - From: John Heidemann <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!
Next by Date: Re: [ns] Problem with ns2.1b5 & 6
Prev by thread: Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!
Next by thread: archiving old versions (was: Re: [ns] (Urgent!) ns-2.1b2 is needed!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread