[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ns] using WF2Q+ for TCP
Dear Young S. Choi,
I tried it under ns-allinone-2.1b6 ? I will try it under ns-allinone21b5.
Could you please write steps of installation for wf2q+?
Thanks
Bilgin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Young S. Choi" <[email protected]>
To: "Bilgin Metin" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: [ns] using WF2Q+ for TCP
> Not enough information
>
> I use wf2q+ successfully in ns-allinone2.1b5
>
> Your ns version?
>
> what is the error message?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> And with best regards...
>
> --
> Young S.Choi
> mailto:[email protected]
> ICQ : 93158371
> http://tenet2.knu.ac.kr/~guru0109
> /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
> X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
> / \ - NO Word docs in e-mail . BSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bilgin Metin" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ken" <[email protected]>; "NS2_mail"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 5:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [ns] using WF2Q+ for TCP
>
>
> > Hi,
> > How did you compile it? I could not compile it . ( I wrote wf2q+.cc to
> > "makefile" then make etc, but it does not work)
> > Could you please write it step by step?
> > thanks
> > Bilgin
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken" <[email protected]>
> > To: "NS2_mail" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 12:47 AM
> > Subject: [ns] using WF2Q+ for TCP
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have found the wf2q+.cc code for Worst-case weighted fair queuing
> > > algorithm.
> > > When using UDP TRAFFIC, it worked very well, each flow deserves its
own
> > > proportion
> > > of bandwidth.
> > > But when using TCP/FTP, the throughput become abnormal. I use
> trace-queue
> > > to trace the last node, there are only 'several' packets received in
> about
> > > 20 seconds.
> > > (I also enlarge the queue size to avoid the behavior, but failed)
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anybody have the idea to conquer the problem?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>