[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ns] TCP Vegas question/minor bug (?)
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Eric Weigle wrote:
> > } else {
> > ++nrexmitpack_;
> > nrexmitbytes_ += bytes;
> }
> I know it's just the insignificant instrumentation code, but they can't *both*
> be right. Shouldn't the else clause in the Vegas code be like that of the
> Tahoe/reno/etc code, moved to the outer scope?
Yup. Looks like your own addition for this in:
http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/archive/ns-users/webarch/2000/msg05117.html
on 28 Oct got garbled when introduced to tcp-vegas.cc 1.32 on 31 Oct.
http://www.isi.edu/cgi-bin/nsnam/cvsweb/ns-2/tcp-vegas.cc
(I do think the validation tests need to stress
counter/instrumentation variables more...)
L.
wondering how many other instrumentation fixes to vegas are out there.
<[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>