[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ns] nsaddr_t or ns_addr_t?
Seems to me it should be a ns_addr_t. Since this method, and its otcl
linkage were never used in any code in distribution, looks like it was
neglected when ns addressing was changed.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Ken Sedgwick wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm confused by the dst parameter:
>
> Agent::sendto(int nbytes, const char* flags, nsaddr_t dst);
>
> Shouldn't it be a ns_addr_t instead?
>
> If not, how should the nsaddt_t argument be interpreted to fill
> in the ns_addr_t "dst_" field?
>
> Many thanks in advance ...
>
> Ken
>
> Ken Sedgwick
> Zodiac Networks
> [email protected]
>
>