[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ns] COPYRIGHTS out of date?

To: Will Newton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ns] COPYRIGHTS out of date?
From: John Heidemann <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:46:23 -0700
cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Message from Will Newton <[email protected]> of "Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:57:12 BST." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

>
>In the COPYRIGHTS file of ns, there is a license that is rather non-free, but 
>when I looked in the code, it appears it has been relicensed under old style 
>BSD terms. Am I correct in assuming the COPYRIGHTS file is out of date in 
>this respect?
>
> * Copyright (c) 2000, Nortel Networks.
> * All rights reserved.
> *
> * License is granted to copy, to use, to make and to use derivative
> * works for research and evaluation purposes.
> *
> * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR
> * IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
> * WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> *
>


COPYRIGHTS was out of date.  NORTEL relicenced their code on BSD terms
(THANKS!).

   -John Heidemann

References:
- [ns] COPYRIGHTS out of date?
  - From: Will Newton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [ns] Agents and Transport layer problem
Next by Date: [ns] hello
Prev by thread: [ns] COPYRIGHTS out of date?
Next by thread: [ns] NAM-1.0a10 Crashes on nam files in ex directory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread