re: Draft comments and questions...

From: Eric Travis ([email protected])
Date: Mon Aug 04 1997 - 17:11:41 EDT


Proof reading via the Internet is a humbling, but nonetheless rewarding
experience...

Matt,

> Please tell me this is a Fraudian slip.
> 2.2 Common Misconceptions about TCP
> 2.2.1 TCP does work in satellite environments
> Absolutely wrong regardless !!!

Yeah... you know the rule about not editing code when you're
mentally impaired (due to fatigue in this case), it applies
to document editing too :o)

I fumbled rewording headers on the fly while "proof-reading"
early this morning.

It originally read:

2.2.1 TCP does *not* work in satellite environments

I wanted things to be more positive, so I changed the slant
from restating the misconceptions to stating facts and forgot
to fix some of the bullets.

I'm fixing the Current right now to read:

2.2.1 TCP does work in satellite environments

  o Assertions to the contrary are generally raised in relation to
    geostationary satellite operation

  o TCP does work, but performance can be suboptimal when
    compared to terrestrial (or other lower-latency) paths

  o Some performance degradations due to the long-delay environment
    can be mitigated through proper configuration of clients and
    network infrastructures (e.g. router buffer sizes)

Please keep 'em coming...

Eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:28 EST