Form: Reply
Text: (11 lines follow)
ERic
Re:   o TCP does work, but performance can be suboptimal when
    compared to terrestrial (or other lower-latency) paths
Performance is a very subjective thing, maybe we could be more quantative.
         o TCP does work, but the throughput-rate of small files may be lower when
    compared to terrestrial (or other lower-latency) paths
Matt
Original text: (52 lines follow)
>From TRAVIS@SMTPGATE (Eric Travis) {[email protected]}, on 4/8/97 5:11 PM:
To: HALSEM@INTELSAT (matthew halsey)
Cc: AFALK@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}, E@SMTPGATE 
{[email protected]}, TCP-OVER@SMTPGATE 
{[email protected]}
Proof reading via the Internet is a humbling, but nonetheless rewarding
experience...
Matt,
> Please tell me this is a Fraudian slip.
> 2.2 Common Misconceptions about TCP
> 2.2.1 TCP does work in satellite environments
>       Absolutely wrong regardless !!!
Yeah... you know the rule about not editing code when you're
mentally impaired (due to fatigue in this case), it applies
to document editing too :o)
I fumbled rewording headers on the fly while "proof-reading"
early this morning.
It originally read:
2.2.1 TCP does *not* work in satellite environments
I wanted things to be more positive, so I changed the slant
from restating the misconceptions to stating facts and forgot
to fix some of the bullets.
I'm fixing the Current right now to read:
2.2.1 TCP does work in satellite environments
  o Assertions to the contrary are generally raised in relation to
    geostationary satellite operation
  o TCP does work, but performance can be suboptimal when
    compared to terrestrial (or other lower-latency) paths
  o Some performance degradations due to the long-delay environment
    can be mitigated through proper configuration of clients and
    network infrastructures (e.g. router buffer sizes)
Please keep 'em coming...
Eric
Use Proportional Font: true
Previous From: TRAVIS@SMTPGATE (Eric Travis) {[email protected]}
Previous To: HALSEM@INTELSAT (matthew halsey)
Previous Cc: AFALK@SMTPGATE {[email protected]},
 E@SMTPGATE {[email protected]},
 TCP-OVER@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}
Attachment Count: 0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:29 EST