Re[2]: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tcpsat-stand-mech-00.txt

From: [email protected]
Date: Tue Oct 07 1997 - 13:12:34 EDT


     

I have been looking for some information on this type of congestion control in
IPv6. Could somebody provide some pointers.

Thanks
Ravi

--------------
Ravi Malghan
COMSAT Laboratories

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tcpsat-stand-mech-00.txt
Author: Steve Goldstein <[email protected]> at INTERNET
Date: 10/7/97 10:22 AM

At 8:45 AM -0400 10/7/97, Mark Allman wrote:
>... Some people have said that
>we can/should design mechanisms whereby we can tell why a packet was
>dropped (congestion or corruption). Personally, I remain
>unconvinced this will work well (it can never completely work; who
>does a machine tell when it receives a corrupted packet? it can
>never be sure the right host is being told, as the packet is
>corrupt). I may be wrong, it is a research area at best. In the
>absence of such a mechanism, we must choose conservativly and
>therefore take the drop as congestion and backoff.
     
I hear from the IPv6 folk that the latest protocol spec's talk of the
routers setting a congestion bit. If that were done, and if everybody were
to speak IPv6 (let's not hold our breath) TCP would be able to tell the
difference between a packet dropped because of congestion and one lost to
corruption.
     
--Steve G.
     
____________________________________________
Steve Goldstein, National Science Foundation
         +1(703)306-1949 Ext. 1119
 "Let's not procrastinate until next week!"
     
     

Received: from ro.ctd.comsat.com (134.133.40.45) by smtpgw2.cws.comsat.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.11 Enterprise) id 00020571; Tue, 7 Oct 97 12:37:53
-0400
Received: from achtung.sp.trw.com [129.4.51.2]
        by ro.ctd.comsat.com with smtp (Exim 1.71 #2)
        id 0xIcdl-0001DK-00; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 12:37:49 -0400
Received: by achtung.sp.trw.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
        id AA17526; Tue, 7 Oct 97 07:23:49 PDT
Received: from mailman.nsf.gov by achtung.sp.trw.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
        id AA17521; Tue, 7 Oct 97 07:23:42 PDT
Received: from [206.235.19.198] (exor.ncri.cise-nsf.gov [206.235.19.198])
          by mailman.nsf.gov (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
          id KAA17313; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 10:28:16 -0400
X-Sender: [email protected]
Message-Id: <v03110714b05ff5a14e1c@[206.235.19.198]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 10:22:38 -0400
To: [email protected], Francesco Potorti` <[email protected]>
From: Steve Goldstein <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tcpsat-stand-mech-00.txt
Cc: "Dan Glover" <[email protected]>,
        [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:30 EST