Re: Re[2]: TCP over GEO < 512kbps

From: Chuck Nunez ([email protected])
Date: Mon Nov 10 1997 - 17:24:09 EST


Hans,

I tend to agree. In fact I have seen delays upwards of 800 ms. In the
absence of measured delays, we should be prepared to deal with delays
greater than the 500-540 ms text books like to quote.

Regards,
Chuck

At 01:58 PM 11/10/97 -0500, Hans Kruse wrote:
>At 10:27 -0800 11/10/97, Jon Mansey wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Please excuse a newbie question, but where does the 0.6 derive from in
>>these calcs? Is it the latency introduce by the trip up and back to the
>>satellite? If so it seems rather high, my calcs give me more like 250ms.
>
>It is the _round-trip_ delay. That means twice up and back, plus any
>equipment (buffer, routers) delays. We typically measure 560ms round-trip
>delays on ACTS at T1 rates.
>
>
>Hans Kruse, Associate Professor
>McClure School of Communication Systems Management, Ohio University
>9 S. College Street
>Athens, OH 45701
>614-593-4891 voice, 614-593-4889 fax, [email protected]
>
>
>
>
Staff Systems Engineer (610) 531-3771
Lockheed Martin Corporation (610) 962-3698 FAX
King Of Prussia, PA [email protected] 1



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:32 EST