I'm sorry to hear that.
Have you used a satellite link recently?
Our (INTELSAT) links sometimes don't have a single error for a year, and I'm
sure our competition offers similar quality.
I would be interested to know the specifics of your experience.
Matt Halsey
INTELSAT
-------------
Original Text
>From TELFORD0@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}, on 17/6/98 7:21 PM:
To: AGARWAL@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}, 00@SMTPGATE {[email protected]},
TCP-OVER@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}
Cc: TELFORD0@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}, BODZIA@SMTPGATE {[email protected]},
NADIA@SMTPGATE {[email protected]}
In a message dated 6/17/98 3:54:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
> One more factor that affects performance is congestion (this
> is true for terrestrial Internet links, as well). Presumably
> if you have routers that can provide guaranteed QoS to voice traffic,
> perhaps based on RSVP, then performance wont degrade under congestion
> (we haven't tried this yet).
In my experience satellite links are still among the noisiest with
which one must deal in computer networking situations.
The concept of reserving bandwidth or guaranteeing delay
via RSVP is one of the silliest to grace the IETF (and
a lot of silly ideas appear in the IETF forum viz
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/Telford001/#CLASS">"Who is Telford?"</A>).
But I cannot imagine taking bandwidth or latency reservations
seriously in the context of noisy links.
Joachim Martillo
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/Telford001/">Telford Tools, Inc.</A>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:44 EST