Dear tcpsat,
I am a newcomer to the list, and I have just seen the BER discussion.
I do have may years experience in the design of satellite modems, and there
is an undisclosed effect at low Signal To Noise Ratio. When symbol rate is
low or demodulator chain local oscillator chain has not pure enough
oscillators (poor phase noise), the demodulator performance degrades
sharply, much worse than the thermal noise erfc function.
Poor phase noise produces frequent cycle slips: the carrier tracker looses
a cycle and delays or advances itself PI/2 (for QPSK). In an uncoded
transmission, this procudes few errors, but the effect is terrible for FEC,
so that it is needed to restart synchronization, thus producing burst
errors of thousands of bits (somehow user configurable), thus uncorrectable
by RS or other mechanisms. These bursts of errors ruins the long term BER
and makes the link virtually unusable for very low SNR.
As previously stated, this effect can be compensated by proper hardware
design, but for low cost commercial systems, this cannot be given for
granted.
Best regards
Luis Miguel Brugarolas
-------------------------------------------------------------
Luis Miguel Brugarolas SIRE, Sistemas y Redes Telematicas
Parque Tecnologico de Madrid c/Isaac Newton 1
28760 TRES CANTOS (madrid) SPAIN
Tf: +34-1-8043580 Fx: +34-1-8043717 email: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------
RFC-822-headers:
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by mail.hac.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3246)
id <[email protected]>; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw-es05.hac.com by mail.hac.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3246)
with ESMTP id <[email protected]>; Tue,
29 Sep 1998 00:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from assateague.lerc.nasa.gov ([139.88.112.23])
by fw-es05.hac.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA10658; Tue,
29 Sep 1998 00:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (listserv@localhost) by assateague.lerc.nasa.gov
(NASA LeRC 8.7.4.1/2.01-main) id CAA02323; Tue,
29 Sep 1998 02:25:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from relay.eunet.es (fw01.lerc.nasa.gov [139.88.145.14])
by assateague-fi.lerc.nasa.gov with ESMTP (NASA LeRC 8.7.4.1/2.01-main)
id CAA02317; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 02:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by relay.eunet.es (8.8.8/8.8.8)
id IAA22748 for [email protected]; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:20:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from LuisMiguel.sire.es ([193.127.11.7])
by linux1.sire.es (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA14943 for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 06:55:34 +0100
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:11:05 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:11:04 +0200
From: Luis Miguel Brugarolas <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Bit errors, is this really an issue ?
Sender: [email protected]
Message-id: <[email protected]>
Organization: SIRE, Sistemas y Redes =?UNKNOWN?Q?Telem=E1ticas?=
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Correo electr*nico de Internet de Microsoft/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Precedence: bulk
X-Authentication-warning: assateague.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to
[email protected] using -f
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:47 EST