>The plan is to us proxies on each remote and one on the VSAT HUB. We are now
>testing Satbooster and Venturi, do you know similar products like this ?
The Mentat SkyX Gateway XR10. See http://www.mentat.com/skyx/xr10.html.
DC
>
>Guy
>
>
>Please respond to Lloyd Wood <[email protected]>
>
>To: Joe Touch <[email protected]>
>cc: Guy Raymakers@EDSBELGIUM, [email protected], [email protected]
>Subject: Re: HTTP performance issues
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>>>> Hi ,
>>>>
>>>> We are now in the process of rolling-out web based applications to a
>>>>number
>of
>>>> remote VSAT connected sites. With the tests we did, I have to conclude
>>>>that
>the
>>>> performance of HTTP is rather poor.
>
>end-to-end performance of HTTP is always poor. That's why we have
>proxy caches. Are you using proxy caches, and if so where are they
>located?
>
>(And if not, why not? http://ircache.nlanr.net/ etc.)
>
>L.
>
><[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:53 EST