Re: RE: RFC implementations

From: bc azur ([email protected])
Date: Thu Dec 23 1999 - 13:20:26 EST


I know actually the performance of 1323 but my question is as follows:
does any one have done some tests on RFC 2001 and 2018 specifically to
evaluate the gain or are there publications on this topic comparing the
different enhancement and their evaluations. For 1323 I know this
formula and I have tested window size variation.

>It's actually very simple to explain how RFC1323 helps. It can be
>summarized as:
>
> WINDOW SIZE
>Throughput = -------------- upto the actual bandwidth minus proto oh
> ROUNDTRIP TIME
>
>I have been able to push data at 98+% of available theoretical
bandwidth
>over high
>delay.
>
>GReg
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
>Behalf Of bc azur
>Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 5:01 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RFC implementations
>
>
>Dear colleagues,
>I have recently been involved in enhancing TCP for high speed satellite

>communications and I would like to know the state of art in the field
>of RFC implementations. I know that there have been implementations of
>RFC 1323 and 2018 and 2001. Does any one have some view graphs showing
>the real benefits of these RFC implementations and the conditions it
has
> been realized. For 1323 it's immediate but for the other RFC it's
>difficult to quantify. Besides these RFC's what are those likely to be
>normalized. I am actually working for a small company specialized in
>protocol evaluation.
>Many thanks
>bc
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:58 EST