RE: nt to nt tcpsat problems

From: Noam Gonen - Israel ([email protected])
Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 10:04:07 EST

  • Next message: [email protected]: "Re:Fwd:RE: nt to nt tcpsat problems"

            Regarding DefaultReceiveWindow \ DefaultSendWindow :

            Note that applications can modify this value on a per-socket basis
    with the SO_RCVBUF socket option.
            so your changes might be "undone" on a per app. basis.

            regards,
            Noam G. ([email protected])

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Marcelo Reis [SMTP:[email protected]]
    > Sent: � 11 ������ 2000 14:23
    > To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
    > Subject: RES: nt to nt tcpsat problems
    >
    > Hi Graham,
    >
    > For winsock applications you need also to set two more variables:
    > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Afd\Parameters\Defaul
    > tR
    > eceiveWindow
    > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Afd\Parameters\Defaul
    > tS
    > endWindow
    >
    > Both of type REG_DWORD.
    >
    > I don't know if it applies to you, but NT4 SP5 has a math error in its tcp
    > stack that causes the retransmit timer to be incorrectly computed, leading
    > to unnecessary retransmissions. There is a new tcpip.sys file that fixes
    > that bug. If you need this file and also the MS bug report regarding this,
    > please let me know.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Marcelo M. Reis
    > [email protected]
    >
    > > ----- Mensagem original -----
    > > De: Graham Street [SMTP:[email protected]]
    > > Enviada em: Quinta-feira, 10 de Fevereiro de 2000 11:04
    > > Para: [email protected]
    > > Assunto: nt to nt tcpsat problems
    > >
    > > Hi all,
    > >
    > > We're trying to run windows file sharing protocols over a tcp sat link
    > > and getting miserable performance, even after setting TcpWindowSize to
    > > 65536. We can get about 100-250k max. We are trying to get at least
    > > one megabit out of it. Is this even possible? We can get 1-2 megabits
    > > ftping from a sun box over satellite...
    > >
    > > does anyone know of any clever (cheap) solutions (spoofing nacks?,
    > > translating
    > > to udp?)
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > Graham Street
    > > [email protected]



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 16 2000 - 10:54:35 EST