It's true. But if you use the ftp client that comes with windows it will use
the default values configured.
Regards,
Marcelo M. Reis
[email protected]
> ----- Mensagem original -----
> De: Noam Gonen - Israel [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Enviada em: Quarta-feira, 16 de Fevereiro de 2000 12:04
> Para: 'Marcelo Reis'; '[email protected]'; [email protected]
> Assunto: RE: nt to nt tcpsat problems
>
> Regarding DefaultReceiveWindow \ DefaultSendWindow :
>
> Note that applications can modify this value on a per-socket basis
> with the SO_RCVBUF socket option.
> so your changes might be "undone" on a per app. basis.
>
> regards,
> Noam G. ([email protected])
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marcelo Reis [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent: � 11 ������ 2000 14:23
> > To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
> > Subject: RES: nt to nt tcpsat problems
> >
> > Hi Graham,
> >
> > For winsock applications you need also to set two more variables:
> >
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Afd\Parameters\Defaul
> > tR
> > eceiveWindow
> >
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Afd\Parameters\Defaul
> > tS
> > endWindow
> >
> > Both of type REG_DWORD.
> >
> > I don't know if it applies to you, but NT4 SP5 has a math error in its
> tcp
> > stack that causes the retransmit timer to be incorrectly computed,
> leading
> > to unnecessary retransmissions. There is a new tcpip.sys file that fixes
> > that bug. If you need this file and also the MS bug report regarding
> this,
> > please let me know.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Marcelo M. Reis
> > [email protected]
> >
> > > ----- Mensagem original -----
> > > De: Graham Street
> [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > > Enviada em: Quinta-feira, 10 de Fevereiro de 2000 11:04
> > > Para: [email protected]
> > > Assunto: nt to nt tcpsat problems
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We're trying to run windows file sharing protocols over a tcp sat link
> > > and getting miserable performance, even after setting TcpWindowSize to
> > > 65536. We can get about 100-250k max. We are trying to get at least
> > > one megabit out of it. Is this even possible? We can get 1-2
> megabits
> > > ftping from a sun box over satellite...
> > >
> > > does anyone know of any clever (cheap) solutions (spoofing nacks?,
> > > translating
> > > to udp?)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Graham Street
> > > [email protected]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 16 2000 - 13:58:41 EST