Re: Burstiness WIth increased max cwnd.

From: Kacheong Poon ([email protected])
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 18:12:41 EST

  • Next message: Zachary Amsden: "Re: Burstiness WIth increased max cwnd."

    > With Window scaling in TCP, the back-to-back packets a TCP flow sends
    > can be very high. I was wondering if there is some study evaluating the
    > increase in burstiness of TCP traffic with larger cwnd. Or, in general,
    > are there some papers talking about how bursty the traffic is as seen by a
    > router?

    Do you mean the bursty traffic after there is a dropped segment? If there is
    no dropped segment (including ACKs), TCP is as bursty as it is without window
    scaling, sending 3 segments for every ACK (assuming delayed ACK for every 2
    segments). I believe many implementations now have some simple form of
    bursty control. And with SACK and various forms of NewReno, I think TCP is
    not as busrty as it used to be when there is no window scaling.

                                                            K. Poon.
                                                            [email protected]



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 24 2000 - 19:02:46 EST