RE: Burstiness WIth increased max cwnd.

From: Lloyd Wood ([email protected])
Date: Fri Feb 25 2000 - 06:03:48 EST

  • Next message: Peter Lewis: "The VoDSL 2000 Conference"

    On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Samaraweera, Nihal wrote:

    > This is my favorite reference which explains the problem (please check the
    > latest version from the IETF web).

    That's from July 1997, and internet drafts expire after six months.

    good luck finding a copy...

    L.
    >
    > C. Partridge, 'ACK Spacing for High Delay-Bandwidth Paths with Insufficient
    > Buffering', IETF, draft-partridge-e2e-ackspacing-00.txt, July 1997.
    >
    > I also got some more explanation and simulation results:
    >
    > N.K.G. Samaraweera, 'Return Link Optimisation for Internet Service Provision
    >
    > Using DVB-S Networks', CCR, ACM SIGCOMM, volume 29, number 3, July 1999.
    > http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/ccr/archive/1999/jul99/ccr-9907-samaraweera4.html
    > .
    >
    > good luck!!
    > nihal.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: mukul goyal [mailto:[email protected]]
    > Sent: 24 February 2000 17:04 PM
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: Burstiness WIth increased max cwnd.
    >
    >
    > With Window scaling in TCP, the back-to-back packets a TCP flow sends
    > can be very high. I was wondering if there is some study evaluating the
    > increase in burstiness of TCP traffic with larger cwnd. Or, in general,
    > are there some papers talking about how bursty the traffic is as seen by a
    > router?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Mukul
    >
    >

    <[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 06:39:47 EST