Re: sat-ll

From: Craig Partridge ([email protected])
Date: Wed May 24 2000 - 07:40:40 EDT

  • Next message: Mark Allman: "Re: sat-ll"

    In message <[email protected]>, "ketan bajaj" writes:

    >Attached is a paper which was accepted for publication in Globecomm'99, but
    >couldn't be published due to some unavoidable conditions.
    >I do not intend to publish it, and it is available for use via this mailing
    >list.

    If you don't have enough confidence in your work to take the time to get
    it published, why should we take the time to read it?

    I say this partly tongue-in-cheek, but also with some seriousness. Getting
    papers published requires hard work, and often includes fixing errors in
    one's ideas. An unwillingness to see a paper through the publication
    process speaks poorly of the ideas.

    Craig



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 24 2000 - 08:33:51 EDT