RE: Moving Targets

From: Smith JR, Harry E ([email protected])
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:57:58 EDT

  • Next message: Dani I. Widjanarko: "Re: Moving Targets"

    I am not sure that LEO are a good answer. Have you thought about how many
    satellites you will need. I would guess around 5 or 6 in the orbit trace.
    The second problem will be the handover of the data between the satellites.
    This means either cross links or a single hub that all satellites can see
    and the routing is on the ground. A third concern would be that
    utilization. Most of the time they would not be over Australia.

    A better idea would be a set of towers along the route like 3rd generation
    mobile system. While the standards only give 2Mbps for fixed station unless
    you are talking about a bullet train, I think they could be considered as
    stationary. It will take a little thought.

    Depending on the services offered, you might be able to use part of a GEO
    transponder to feed the 3rd Gen Mobile from a single access point.

    Harry Smith
    Lockheed Martin Mission and Data Services
    408 - 473 6491

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
    > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 10:51 PM
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: Moving Targets
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm doing a research project about providing Internet access to moving
    > targets on the eastern seabord of Australia. In this case, the moving
    > targets are trains.
    >
    > We really need to provide around 1MB or so downstream, maybe 56k or so
    > uplink. I've been doing a lot of searching but facts seem to be hard
    > to come by.
    >
    > By my reckoning something like a link to an LEO constellation is
    > needed to make this work because:
    > - GEO satellites can't easily provide this type of bandwidth
    > - GEO satellites require reasonably large dishes and need to
    > fairly precisely targetted at the sat
    > - Line of sight is needed for GEO links to work
    >
    > Basically, I'm hoping that with LEO links a dish won't even be
    > required, some sort of antenna? Do any of the currently existing LEO
    > constellations provide this sort of service? Future ones?
    >
    > Am I completely barking up the wrong tree here? Is there a better way
    > of providing reasonably high speed internet access to moving vehicles
    > without cabling etc.
    >
    > Thanks in advance,
    > Shaun



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 15:14:27 EDT