Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics

From: Fred Baker ([email protected])
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:53:19 EST

Next message: Jacob Heitz: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"

Previous message: Fred Baker: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
In reply to: Fred Baker: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
Next in thread: Fred Baker: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

By the way, I missed the initial message in this thread. What is proposed?
Is it suggested that we move the acknowledge pointer (the sequence number
of the next octet that the receiver expects to receive), or increase the
window amount?

Next message: Jacob Heitz: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
Previous message: Fred Baker: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
In reply to: Fred Baker: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
Next in thread: Fred Baker: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:42:37 EST