Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics

From: Lloyd Wood ([email protected])
Date: Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:28:40 EST

  • Next message: Alhussein Abouzeid: "Re: TCP end-to-end Semantics"

    On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Mingyan Liu wrote:

    > How about we use an IP option indicating "spoofing (not) allowed",
    > similar to "no fragmentation", and require that the spoofer conform to
    > it, will that make sense? (This then will not require user's knowledge
    > but the application writers'...)

    You can always spoof such an option, making it worthless.

    L.

    <[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 12 2001 - 10:22:26 EST