[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: loss monitor
What was the delay between two nodes. It may be possible that before
those last 3 packets were deivered to loss Monitor, your experiment ended
because of the time specified by you in stop command. Those 3 packets
were yet waiting for the scheduler to work on them for delivery to loss
Monitor.
Hope this helps. (If I am wrong, some other person will correct me :-))
Miten.
> Hello,
> I am using ns-2.0. I wrote a small script which creates 2 nodes. I used CBR on one node and LossMonitor on the other. Also, I used monitor-queue to monitor the link beween these 2 nodes. The output I had is:
> Output of state variables of the LossMonitor agent:
> lossMonitor nlost: 0
> lossMonitor nreceived: 531
> lossMonitor expected: 531
>
> Output of state variables due to monitor-queue:
> parrivals_=534, pdrops_=0, pdepartures_=534
>
> That is to say, the number of packets received by the LossMonitor is 531 which is less than the number reported when using the method monitor-queue.
> So, would you please report on how this happened?
>
> Randa
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Miten N. Mehta Graduate Research Assistant
3902, Collegemain, #908 Computer Science
Bryan, Texas A & M University
Texas-77801. College Station, TX-77843
Tel.#(409) 846 1451 (409) 845 5007
E-mail# [email protected]
Home Page : http://www.cs.tamu.edu/people/mmehta
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"UNTIL YOUR DREAMS COME TRUE, KEEP ON WORKING FOR THAT"
----------------------------------------------------------------------