[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ns] question about the shortest path
yes. ad hoc routing does not always give you the shortest path
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Liang Qin wrote:
> Hi ns-users,
>
> I'm running wireless ad-hoc examples from CMU by using their scenario
> files. I got a problem when I reading the trace file:
>
> --------
> s 50.922355194 _2_ AGT --- 383 cbr 64 [0 0 0 0] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 0] [114] 0 4
> r 50.922355194 _2_ RTR --- 383 cbr 64 [0 0 0 0] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 0] [114] 0 4
> s 50.922355194 _2_ RTR --- 383 cbr 100 [0 0 0 0] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 28] [114] 0 4
> r 50.923452437 _28_ RTR --- 383 cbr 100 [a2 1c 2 800] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 28] [114] 1 4
> f 50.923452437 _28_ RTR --- 383 cbr 100 [a2 1c 2 800] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 34] [114] 1 4
> r 50.925142474 _34_ RTR --- 383 cbr 100 [a2 22 1c 800] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 34] [114] 2 4
> f 50.925142474 _34_ RTR --- 383 cbr 100 [a2 22 1c 800] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 3] [114] 2 4
> r 50.926412899 _3_ RTR --- 383 cbr 100 [a2 3 22 800] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 3] [114] 3 4
> r 50.926412899 _3_ AGT --- 383 cbr 100 [a2 3 22 800] ------- [2:1 3:0 32 3] [114] 3 4
> -------
> parameters: cbr-50-10-4-64 and scen-1500x300-50-30-1-1
>
> from above info we can see the shortest path(optimal hop count) is 4, but
> actually the hop count is 3, better than the shortest path. Is it possible?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
>
> Liang Qin
>