Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps [Long]

From: Curtis Villamizar ([email protected])
Date: Tue Nov 11 1997 - 11:24:42 EST

Next message: Frank Zeppenfeldt: "Re: TCPLFN patches and Solaris 2.6"
Previous message: Greg Miller: "Re: 600ms"
In reply to: Eric Travis: "Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps [Long]"
Next in thread: Gertjan van Oosten: "Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps"
Reply: Gertjan van Oosten: "Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <[email protected]>, Eric Travis wr
ites:
>
> Everyone advertising arbitrarily
> large windows are not a particularly good idea - at least right now

btw- Arbitrarily large windows are just fine if sufficient buffering
*and* RED gateways are used. One or the other is insufficient. I
suppose this is stated without proof. Can I get away with "Proof is
an exercise for the reader"?)

Curtis

Next message: Frank Zeppenfeldt: "Re: TCPLFN patches and Solaris 2.6"
Previous message: Greg Miller: "Re: 600ms"
In reply to: Eric Travis: "Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps [Long]"
Next in thread: Gertjan van Oosten: "Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps"
Reply: Gertjan van Oosten: "Re: TCP over GEO < 512kbps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 14 2000 - 16:14:32 EST