spoofing standard??

From: Manish Karir ([email protected])
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:37:38 EST

  • Next message: Anil Agarwal: "Re: spoofing standard??"

    I think there is probably enough support on this list and real
    implementation experience to generate some sort of a spoofing
    standard?

    if nothing else an informational document which summarizes the
    most "correct" way of implementing this. I know there have been
    papers and descriptions of this before, but something which has the
    blessings of more than just the authors would be quite useful...that way
    we would atleast have a common base to argue about :)

    does anyone else agree on the need for such a document??

    manish karir

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:40:44 EST