On Jan 15, 2001, Manish Karir wrote:
>I think there is probably enough support on this list and real
>implementation experience to generate some sort of a spoofing
>standard?
>
>if nothing else an informational document which summarizes the
>most "correct" way of implementing this. I know there have been
>papers and descriptions of this before, but something which has the
>blessings of more than just the authors would be quite useful...that way
>we would atleast have a common base to argue about :)
>
>does anyone else agree on the need for such a document??
>
>manish karir
I agree wholeheartedly.
It would certainly provide value to the Internet to have
"robust" spoofing implementations, even though their use may not be
encouraged, except for special environments, such as satellite or wireless
networks.
Anil Agarwal
LMGT
22300 COMSAT Drive
Clarksburg, MD 20871
301-428-4655
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 19:09:40 EST