On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Anil Agarwal wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2001, Manish Karir wrote:
>
> >I think there is probably enough support on this list and real
> >implementation experience to generate some sort of a spoofing
> >standard?
> >
> >if nothing else an informational document which summarizes the
> >most "correct" way of implementing this. I know there have been
> >papers and descriptions of this before, but something which has the
> >blessings of more than just the authors would be quite useful...that way
> >we would atleast have a common base to argue about :)
> >
> >does anyone else agree on the need for such a document??
> >
> >manish karir
>
> I agree wholeheartedly.
Same Here.
-Hussein.
>
> It would certainly provide value to the Internet to have
> "robust" spoofing implementations, even though their use may not be
> encouraged, except for special environments, such as satellite or wireless
> networks.
>
> Anil Agarwal
> LMGT
> 22300 COMSAT Drive
> Clarksburg, MD 20871
> 301-428-4655
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 00:06:23 EST