Abstract

The current practice of publishing articles solely containing textual descriptions of methods is error prone and incomplete. Even when a reproducible workflow or notebook is linked to an article, the text of the article is not well integrated with those computational components, and the workflow and notebook are focused mostly on implementation details that are disconnected from the scientific approach described in the text of the article. Through an analysis of three multi-omics articles, we illustrate why this makes it difficult to understand, reproduce, compare, and reuse computational methods. We propose workflow abstractions that that capture different concepts and perspectives that are important to scientists. These abstractions connect the text of an article to the corresponding workflow, and provide a framework to improve the publication and reproducibility of computational experiments.

Date

March 18, 2026

Authors

Yolanda Gil, Daniel Garijo, Margaret Knoblock, Alyssa Deng, Ravali Adusumilli, Varun Ratnakar, Parag Mallick

Conference

K-CAP Workshops

Pages

17-25